Feeds:
Posts
Comments

This entry is part of Getaway Reads, a weekly e-mail series curated by Stephanie Cawley that features the writing of the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway faculty.
 
 

Notes on Eavesdropping

by Nancy Falkow

I’m not nosey. (Okay, well maybe a little.) I’m just always collecting inspiration. Eavesdropping is when I write down phrases or snippets I hear when I’m out and about, or when I’m listening to podcasts, or watching movies or TV. Sometimes I pop these snippets into my songwriting journal or I keep a running list in my phone.

While listening to a podcast called WTF, I heard the host Marc Maron say in one interview, “Maybe I was always supposed to be this old” (or something very close to that)—and a chorus was born.

It’s that easy. Inspiration can come from anywhere. Maybe it’s Woody Allen, maybe it’s a couple at the table next to you at a restaurant. Just one line can spark an entire song (or essay, or poem).

I wrote “What I’m Doing Right” about my little girl, but a smidgen of inspiration came from somewhere entirely different—I’ll take it wherever I can get it!


 

What I’m Doing Right

by Nancy Falkow

I don’t know what I’m doing right
But in the brightest sky of summer light
You’re the only thing the world can see

Riding every tempered breeze
A splintered morning’s grand trapeze
And all the people see you as you please

And you laugh
But there’s no joke
It makes you laugh even harder

You don’t have any slight of hand
Except to make a wish and reap command
You could walk a smile in anybody’s shoes

And as the day just closes in
You never fail to find a second wind
Just unaware you’ve always been the muse

And you burst
But there’s no star
It makes you fly, even farther

Maybe I was always supposed to be this old
I’ll forever have your hand in mine to walk across the road
(I don’t know what I’m doing right)

Riding every tempered breeze
A splintered morning’s grand trapeze
And all the people see you as you please

And you laugh
But there’s no joke
It makes you laugh even harder

And you burst
But there’s no star
It makes you fly, even farther

Maybe I was always supposed to be this old
I’ll forever have your hand in mine to walk across the road
I don’t know what I’m doing right
 
 
What I'm Doing Right
 
“What I’m Doing Right” was released in December as a charity single in aid of Ireland’s Jack & Jill Children’s Foundation. Visit www.NancyFalkow.Bandcamp.com to donate and download.
 
 
© Nancy Falkow

+ + + + + + + + + +

Nancy Falkow is an Ireland-based (formerly Philadelphia) singer-songwriter. She has shared stages, taxis, dressing rooms, and guitars with nationally touring musicians from Donovan to Daniel Lanois to Richie Havens. Songs of hers have appeared in TV and in film. She has been collaborating with musicians and writing in genres from pop to rock to folk for many years, but was always a teacher and a poet first, and draws from that well of experience with every song and workshop. With three successful albums under her belt, after the birth of her daughter, she began writing for what is her most successful album—”Under the Stars”—which she released under the project name Sunflow. This is her 15th year at the Getaway and she always looks forward to a trip home to run the Song Writing Workshop to see familiar faces and meet new enthusiasts. Her website is www.nancyfalkow.com and you can listen to some songs here.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Want to study with Nancy Falkow? At the 2013 Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway, Nancy will be leading the Song Writing Workshop for the fifteenth year in a row. Click here to find out more.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Advance your craft and energize your writing at the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway. Enjoy challenging and supportive sessions, insightful feedback, and an encouraging community. Learn more.

This entry is part of Getaway Reads, a weekly e-mail series curated by Stephanie Cawley that features the writing of the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway faculty.
 
 

A Murmur of Growing Intensity

from Killing the Messenger

by Thomas Peele

On the morning of August 2, 2007, I drove my then-usual commute from an apartment, not far from the eastern shore of San Francisco Bay in the city of Alameda, to a newsroom nearly twenty miles away in the East Bay suburbs. The route took me in and out of the city of Oakland through tunnels—the first passing beneath a shipping channel, the second carving its way through cumbersome hills. Oakland was little more than the place I passed through to get anywhere—to work, to pick up my wife at her job in San Francisco, to visit friends.

That bright, sunny morning seemed like just another day. I had moved to California seven years earlier and had only recently committed to staying longer, having just turned down a good newspaper job in New Jersey. That summer I was in the throes of finishing a graduate writing program, and my mind was stuck on a looming thesis deadline. The radio was off, and as I drove I dictated ideas into a little recorder about how to finish that tome. As I entered Oakland, I didn’t know that a horrible murder had occurred an hour or so earlier just blocks away—a man had been gunned down on a busy city street by a masked killer.

I had worked for newspapers of various sizes since 1983, pulling myself upward from the traditional starting places of municipal-government and police beats, and now carried the somewhat overblown title of “investigative reporter.” I liked to dig, to get to the bottom of things, to find their roots, their causes. As sort of a subspecialty, I had also carved out a niche writing about the First Amendment, censorship, and press rights. People, I had come to believe, were often ignorant of journalists’ struggles to adequately serve them, the roadblocks we overcome, the daily fights to be watchdogs of the public interest. As I parked my car in the lot next to the long, flat, nearly windowless building that housed the Contra Costa Times, slung a bag over my shoulder, and grabbed my ubiquitous cup of black coffee, I had no idea that three booming reports of a shotgun in Oakland earlier that morning had signaled the convergence of many of my interests.

I walked into a newsroom in transition. The newspaper industry had not yet been rocked the way it would be a few years later, with massive layoffs and closures, but it was starting to tremble. The Contra Costa Times, once a part of the venerable Knight Ridder chain, had recently been put up for sale and bought by MediaNews, the same company that owned the nearbyOakland Tribune. A painful consolidation of news staffs that had competed for years was under way. Everyone, it seemed, was leery of losing their jobs.

As I entered, there was a commotion around the desks where the police reporters sat among an array of scanners and radios, a wall-mounted television dangling over their heads. Even to a skeptical veteran such as me, the buzz seemed different, a real story developing with a murmur of growing intensity about it.

“What’s going on?” I asked.

“Someone shot the editor of the Oakland Post,” a reporter told me.

“Dead?”

“Very,” she deadpanned, glancing up from a computer, a hand briefly covering the mic on her telephone headset.

A journalist? Really? I knew the Post was a small weekly that covered Oakland’s African American community, but I had no idea who was its editor.

“Chauncey Bailey,” the reporter told me and turned away to continue her call.

I knew the name, but only vaguely. Bailey had worked for the Tribune once and had gotten fired for some sort of ethical lapse. I asked an editor if anyone knew yet who had killed Bailey or why. He said no. I felt an immediate frustration. Before the merger, our newsroom would have mobilized to cover the story, but now Oakland was strictly the Tribune’s territory, and I could do nothing. And though I worked primarily on long investigative pieces that often took months, I wanted in on this breaking story. A journalist. Murdered. If someone had killed him over his work, then the implications were boundless.

A few minutes later my phone rang. It was a source I had developed in Oakland a few years earlier, a minor official who often proved helpful with information.

Two theories about the murder were raging across the city, he said, both fueled by rumors concerning Bailey’s personal life—he had been killed either by a jealous husband or boyfriend or by someone seeking retribution over an unpaid debt, a loan shark or shylock. My source had strong credibility, and his leads that Bailey’s slaying had to do with something other than journalism brought me a tinge of relief. It seemed overly dramatic anyway, I realized, to suggest that the editor of a weekly newspaper had been killed for reasons directly related to his job. The last local print reporter killed in th eUnited States was Don Bolles of the Arizona Republic, who was investigating ties between business leaders in Phoenix and the Mafia in 1976 when he suffered fatal wounds in a car bombing. The little Oakland Post was not prone to the type of reportage that provoked anyone. I returned to an analysis of government pay data I’d been working on for months, thinking the Bailey story would blow over in a few days.

Half an hour later, my source called back.

“Bailey was working on a story about the Black Muslim Bakery,” he said.

“Holy shit,” I said out loud, as if I were playing a reporter in a B movie.

That phone call changed everything.
 
 
© Thomas Peele. Published in Killing the Messenger, published by Crown Publishers, 2012. Click to continue reading an excerpt.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Thomas Peele is an investigative reporter and lecturer at the University of California, Berkeley, who has won more than 45 journalism awards during a career on both coasts. His first book, Killing The Messenger, an examination of Black Muslim cults and the 2007 murder of Oakland, Calif. journalist Chauncey Bailey, was published by the Crown Books division of Random House in February 2012. Peele’s essay on the collapse of the Knight Ridder newspaper company, “Oligarchies I Have Known,” won the 2006 Association of Writers and Writing Programs’ Intro Journals Award and was published in Controlled Burn. His work has also appeared in Columbia Journalism ReviewNewsday, and the San Francisco Bay Guardian. Peele holds an MFA in writing from the University of San Francisco and lives in Oakland, California with his wife and twin daughters. You can read an excerpt of Killing The Messenger on his website www.thomaspeele.com.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Want to study with Thomas Peele? At the 2013 Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway, Thomas will be leading the Advanced section of the Art & Craft of Creative Nonfiction. Click here to find out more. He will also be reading during Sunday night’s program.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Advance your craft and energize your writing at the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway. Enjoy challenging and supportive sessions, insightful feedback, and an encouraging community. Learn more.

This entry is part of Getaway Reads, a weekly e-mail series curated by Stephanie Cawley that features the writing of the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway faculty.
 
 

Facts About the Moon

by Dorianne Laux

The moon is backing away from us
an inch and a half each year. That means
if you’re like me and were born
around fifty years ago the moon
was a full six feet closer to the earth.
What’s a person supposed to do?
I feel the gray cloud of consternation
travel across my face. I begin thinking
about the moon-lit past, how if you go back
far enough you can imagine the breathtaking
hugeness of the moon, prehistoric
solar eclipses when the moon covered the sun
so completely there was no corona, only
a darkness we had no word for.
And future eclipses will look like this: the moon
a small black pupil in the eye of the sun.
But these are bald facts.
What bothers me most is that someday
the moon will spiral right out of orbit
and all land-based life will die.
The moon keeps the oceans from swallowing
the shores, keeps the electromagnetic fields
in check at the polar ends of the earth.
And please don’t tell me
what I already know, that it won’t happen
for a long time. I don’t care. I’m afraid
of what will happen to the moon.
Forget us. We don’t deserve the moon.
Maybe we once did but not now
after all we’ve done. These nights
I harbor a secret pity for the moon, rolling
around alone in space without
her milky planet, her only child, a mother
who’s lost a child, a bad child,
a greedy child or maybe a grown boy
who’s murdered and raped, a mother
can’t help it, she loves that boy
anyway, and in spite of herself
she misses him, and if you sit beside her
on the padded hospital bench
outside the door to his room you can’t not
take her hand, listen to her while she
weeps, telling you how sweet he was,
how blue his eyes, and you know she’s only
romanticizing, that she’s conveniently
forgotten the bruises and booze,
the stolen car, the day he ripped
the phones from the walls, and you want
to slap her back to sanity, remind her
of the truth: he was a leech, a fuckup,
a little shit, and you almost do
until she lifts her pale puffy face, her eyes
two craters and then you can’t help it
either, you know love when you see it,
you can feel its lunar strength, its brutal pull.
 
 

Dark Charms

by Dorianne Laux

Eventually the future shows up everywhere:
burly summers and unslept nights in deep
lines and dark splotches, thinning skin.
Here’s the corner store grown to a condo,
the bike reduced to one spinning wheel,
the ghost of a dog that used to be, her trail
no longer trodden, just a dip in the weeds.
The clear water we drank as thirsty children
still runs through our veins. Stars we saw then
we still see now, only fewer, dimmer, less often.
The old tunes play and continue to move us
in spite of our learning, the wraith of romance,
lost innocence, literature, the death of the poets.
We continue to speak, if only in whispers,
to something inside us that longs to be named.
We name it the past and drag it behind us,
bag like a lung filled with shadow and song,
dreams of running, the keys to lost names.
 
 
© Dorianne Laux. “Facts About the Moon” is found in Facts About the Moon (W.W. Norton, 2007), and “Dark Charms” is found in The Book of Men (W.W. Norton, 2011).

+ + + + + + + + + +

Dorianne Laux’s most recent collections are The Book of Men (Winner of The Paterson Prize and The Roanoke-Chowan Award for Poetry) and Facts about the Moon (Winner of the Oregon Book Award). She is co-author of a handbook on writing, The Poet’s Companion, all from W.W. Norton. A finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award and the Lenore Marshall Poetry Prize, Laux is also author of AwakeWhat We Carry, and Smoke from BOA Editions, as well as three fine press editions, Superman: The ChapbookDark Charms, and The Book of Women, from Red Dragonfly Press. The Book of Men was reviewed in the New York Times as one of five books of poems suggested for summer reading; shortly after its release in February, 2011, it reached number one on Amazon.com’s Bestseller list, beating out Tom Waits and Tupac Shakur. Laux teaches poetry in the MFA Program at North Carolina State University and is founding faculty at Pacific University’s Low Residency MFA Program. You can read and listen to some of her poems here.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Want to study with Dorianne Laux? At the 2013 Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway, Dorianne will be leading three sessions of Advanced Poetry Writing. Click here to find out more.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Advance your craft and energize your writing at the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway. Enjoy challenging and supportive sessions, insightful feedback, and an encouraging community. Learn more.

This entry is part of Getaway Reads, a weekly e-mail series curated by Stephanie Cawley that features the writing of the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway faculty.
 
 

Writing with Carly

by Mimi Schwartz

This poem is on my refrigerator door:

I love you, to the moon and stars and all the
Way up to the planet mars.
So one day if I fly up there
You’ll know I love you anywhere.

It has a smiley face above it and “I love you!” in a heart below it—and was written by my granddaughter Carly in the days when she felt like a writer. The feeling began at age four when she read at a family gathering, “On Chanukah you wear a yarmulke!” Everyone clapped, laughed, and hugged her. You’re a poet, we said—and I remembered how, as a child, I read my poems for family gatherings, beaming as Carly beamed.

I bought her a writing journal and she filled it with stories and poems, most often composed while looking out her bedroom window at falling leaves, snowflakes, and spring blossoms. The spelling was her own, but no matter. She’d happily read us her stories about strawberry dreams and rainbows and a daisy trying to grow in a field of daffodils (my favorite).

By second grade, the spelling was correct, thanks to nightly drills requiring original sentences for all thirty words of the week. In third grade, after a poetry unit in school, she told me her poem on my fridge was not good. The first line was “way too long” and “mars” needed a capital. “But I love it!” I said, especially the last two lines that made love fly everywhere. She shrugged. What did I know about rhyme and rhythm!

Fourth grade included a researched report on Northern New Jersey, complete with hand-made maps and photos based on a fieldtrip, plus a “book” of stories based on paintings of Picasso, Renoir, Monet, and Van Gogh. Good assignments from a conscientious, enthusiastic teacher. But they took up free time and involved deadlines and grades. “Writing is hard!” Carly started to say.

I told her how my new book took twelve years to finish, and somehow, soon after she saw it, she asked, “Can we write something together?” I was thrilled—and told her how a friend and her daughter chose a topic to write about each month. She liked the idea and I pictured us filling pages of back and forth exchanges about our inside and outside lives.

Our plan was for me to think up three topics and Carly would choose the one we’d write on. The first month was “Purple” and I wrote six versions of a poem, worrying. I had taught writing for thirty years and knew how to encourage my students to find their words, but this was my granddaughter and I hadn’t a clue. Should I write as I usually did? For honesty—and to see what comes out? Or should I write for a nine-year old: something simple, suitable, and inspirational? I tried for both: to encourage her muse and be true to myself. Who should send first?” I asked in an email around week three. “You” she answered, and so I sent this (purposely making my first line “way too long”):

Purple is the Best

Pink was not for me, a girl who loved horses more than dolls.
Yellow was too weak, like a pale sun.
White, too much responsibility,
Red and Orange, way too showy.
Black, scary.

I wanted Blue of a bold sky,
Rust to match my freckles,
And often go-everywhere Beige.
But lately, it’s Purple I love best,
the color of promise in sunsets
And what you find staring
Into burning logs
Long enough.

A day later she sent this:

Purple is…

Purple is a juicy grape
waiting on a vine,
Purple is the sky
before the sun begins to shine.
Purple is the bottom
of exquisite rainbows.
Purple is a color
that always seems to glow.

I loved this! We’d just had a conversation in purple, and I imagined great things. I’d invite all my writer friends who are grandparents to follow our plan and we’d soon have an anthology to inspire inter-generational writing and sharing. Here’s a new kind of writing movement, I would write in a proposal to publishers: no grades, no rules, just one voice encouraging another to speak.

Dear Carly,
I love your poem…and it’s great that we both see the glow in purple. I’m putting yours on the refrigerator door.
Love, Mim

I wanted to praise, but not over-praise, always remembering the guy in a writing class I once joined. He came with the first three pages of a promising story and everyone said, “Keep going! It’s great!” (And this from a group not generous with praise.) The same thing happened for three more weeks—he’d bring a beginning, we’d love it—and then he disappeared. His own writing promise scared him and our enthusiasm made it worse. I can identify with that, the feeling after I write something I like, that it was dumb luck and won’t happen again.

Carly and I discussed next month’s topic—and she suggested an animal. If I named four of them, she’d pick one. I emailed: “Turtle, Oyster, Lion, or Hummingbird”—and got back “HUMMINGBIRD!” We were off again, and I started a story about a girl who loves leprechauns and sees one flying… Three weeks later, I had a draft of something. It wasn’t finished, which was good, because I wanted her to feel “I could do that too!” I even had some possible scenes we might fill in together. I waited, wanting her to go first but near the end of the month I finally asked “Who should go first this time?”
“You!” she said again, and the next day when I visited her at home, she said, “I love the story–except the girl’s name, Sylvie, is too old-fashioned!”
“What should it be?”
“Hannah,” she said.
“That sounds old-fashioned to me,” I said.
And then she said “Becka,” which we both liked. Our first feedback session had gone very well! I thought.

But her poem or story didn’t come and two days into the new month, my daughter called. Carly was embarrassed to tell me but she was too busy to write something. Too much schoolwork. “Maybe during the summer,” I emailed her. “Okay,” she answered.

Did I intimidate her with a four-page story? But she has shown me longer stories than that. Was it really her schoolwork and her busy schedule? She did have school, tennis, ballet, choir, and play dates—all filling up the quiet time needed to sit and look out her bedroom window and imagine.

I thought of myself at ten, how I stopped writing after winning a school prize for a suspense story about a girl in a thunderstorm. My teacher put it the school “newspaper” (mimeographed in those days!) and I was proud. But I didn’t write another story until I took a creative writing class in high school. And after that, I stopped again until ten years after grad school.

What happened? Book reports, term papers, and analytic essays “happened” with their expository rules for conveying information, analyzing it, and comparing and contrasting. I remember no mean teacher writing, “Too creative!” in the margins, handing me a C+. That is what many students tell me happened to them in middle school and high school. I only remember that the strong emphasis on writing with control, the opposite of writing to discover, so needed for creativity.

Plus there was the scared factor. The more I studied great writers, the more I thought “I could never do that!” And the more my work was graded (no matter what the grade), the louder I heard the Criticizer in my head, saying, “This is dumb! This is no good! What others do is better.” It stopped me from taking chances, risking what I didn’t know, listening for what I couldn’t hear. The schoolhouse voice had crowded the lyric voices out.

In high school, those who wanted to be “The Poets” warded off insecurities in Beatnik black with long earrings and the occasional beret. My neck was too short—and I felt too dumb and dumpy for that role. So I joined the high school newspaper as sports writer and ad writer, gained confidence in academic writing, and that’s what I did until I was thirty-one. Then, on a sabbatical in a foreign country, I found myself with four hours of free time a day. The kids were in school, I didn’t know anyone, I barely spoke the language—and I began writing about being “An American Abroad.” When the local paper published it as a three-part series and people responded, I remembered the writer I used to want to be. My muse came back and stayed. Or maybe it was there all along and I had just looked through it.

In the Picasso Museum in Barcelona, the first room contains Picasso’s work when he was eight or nine, before he formally entered art school. His sketches were full of whimsy—mythic kings, bullfights, and dogs—that filled his world before he absorbed the great medieval, classical and renaissance art. But many rooms later—after his Blue Period, Rose Period, Cubism and all the other movements he took in and made into his own—the paintings in the last room seemed to return to the themes and spirit of his boyhood, deepened but still there.

Too many of us don’t risk the artistic journey Picasso took. We lose the natural confidence and freshness that we have as children and label ourselves uncreative for good. True, the most committed find their way despite the Criticizer, the Academy, the Term Paper, and The Poet’s uniform. But others get lost in silence or in false personas that lack that early authenticity. As a teacher of creative nonfiction, I’ve wanted everyone to overcome both these obstacles and have found that this genre offers the best chance. For we all have life stories to tell and, if told well, others will listen.

To make my case I often read students, early on, from the diary from Opal, a six-year-old orphan in a mining camp at the turn-of-the-century (found in Gabrielle Rico’s Writing the Natural Way). Opal had learned to read and write from her parents before they died and somehow was able to write:

Today the grandpa dug potatoes in the field
I followed along after.
I picked them up and piled them in piles.
Some of them were very plump.
And all the time I was picking up potatoes
I did have conversations with them.
To some potatoes I did tell about
My hospital in the near woods
And all the little folk in it
And how much prayers and sons
And mentholatum helps them to have well feels.

To other potatoes I did talk about my friends—
How the crow, Lars Porsena,
Does have a fondness for collecting things,
How Aphrodite, the mother pig, has a fondness
For chocolate creams.
How my dear pig, Peter Paul Rubens, wears a
Little bell coming to my cathedral service.

Potatoes are very interesting folks.
I think they must see a lot
Of what is going on in the earth.
There have so many eyes.
Too, I did have thinks
Of all their growing days
There in the ground,
And all the things they did hear.

And after, I did count the eyes
Their every potato did have,
And their numbers were in blessings.

I have thinks these potatoes growing here
Did have knowings of star songs.
I have kept watch in the field at night
And I have seen the stars
Look kindness down upon them.
And I have walked between the rows of potatoes
And I have watched
The star gleams on their leaves.

My students get it: how the grammar is bad, the rules flaunted, and yet with a voice so natural, fresh, and true, Opal makes us see the potato her way forever. Whatever the age and talent, they begin to think: “If she can do it, so can I!” And, mostly, good things happen.

I hope that Carly will hold onto her natural bent. And teachers will help with great creative writing assignments, whatever the curriculum level. And in the summer she and I will pick up our writing exchanges again. All that she needs is to keep finding what I lost for many years: the quiet space and daring to listen to herself think, wonder, and imagine new dreams of strawberries and rainbows, maybe in purple, maybe hummingbirds.
 
 

© Mimi Schwartz. Originally published in New Plains Review, and forthcoming in Mimi’s new memoir When History Gets Personal. 

+ + + + + + + + + +

Mimi Schwartz is the author of two memoirs: Good Neighbors, Bad Times—Echoes of My Father’s German Village and Thoughts from a Queen-Sized Bed. She is co-author of Writing True, the Art and Craft of Creative Nonfiction, which is used in over 250 undergraduate and MFA programs nationwide (written with Sondra Perl). She is Professor Emerita in Writing at Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, where she taught nonfiction for 22 years. Her short work has appeared in The Missouri ReviewAgniCreative NonfictionFourth GenreCalyxThe New York Times,TikkunThe Philadelphia Inquirer MagazineFlorida ReviewBrevityThe Writer’s ChronicleThe Writer, among others. Seven of her essays have been Notables in Best American Essays, and she’s been a MacDowell Fellow and a Geraldine R. Dodge Fellow. To read some of her work visit www.mimischwartz.net.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Want to study with Mimi Schwartz? At the 2013 Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway, Mimi will be leading the memoir portion of the Creative Writing Sampler. Click here to find out more. 

+ + + + + + + + + +

Advance your craft and energize your writing at the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway. Enjoy challenging and supportive sessions, insightful feedback, and an encouraging community. Learn more.

This entry is part of Getaway Reads, a weekly e-mail series curated by Stephanie Cawley that features the writing of the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway faculty.
 
 

The Photographer’s Divorce

by BJ Ward

She walks out the door for the final time
and her absence is already moving in, clutching
its baggage, looking for whiskey in his cupboard,
negatives in his camera.
Her absence sets the table for one
where it and the man will dine
alone together for many nights.
As they eat each night
in the stark light of a single
candle (how could flame be so cold?),
the absence’s shadow flattens out
across the walls he and she once painted together,
leaves a film that thickens his house,
aggregately closing the space he lives in
like a constricting automatic
camera lens
attempting to photograph an object
or occurrence
to which he’s too close to see clearly.

It’s focusing and focusing
not able to get it—
it focuses so hard
it pulls the garden into the house,
and then the street—
after that, a mountain, a few distant clouds—
soon the whole world
is something he can’t see
as it crowds his house.
In fact, everything is now in his house
except her.
 
 

Babyproofing

by BJ Ward

A baby sharpens the eye.
You used to try to make the world suffer
but now, Mr. Harley-Davidson,
glance around your nursery
and try to make the world safer.
Be rid of the poker
and shovel your own father
left to you—you could never
build a fire anyway.
The whisky moves higher
and the dogs get shot
for distemper. Bang
down the nails that have extruded
for as long as you’ve lived
here. How many nights
you’ve whetted
edges on knives
you must now move from edges.
Look at that baby
with your jaw, your hands—
you’ll have to squeeze hard
to open a door from here
on in.
           You’re almost frantic now,
aren’t you Daddy?
                              Here’s all
you can do: pick up everyday
objects, then examine them.
Everything might hurt.
 
 
© BJ Ward. “The Photographer’s Divorce” was originally published in Inside Jersey. “Babyproofing” was originally published in U.S. 1 Worksheets, in 2008.

+ + + + + + + + + +

BJ Ward is the author of Jackleg Opera: Collected Poems 1990-2012, forthcoming in September, 2013, as part of the IO Poetry Series (North Atlantic Books). His other books are Gravedigger’s Birthday, 17 Love Poems with No Despair, and Landing in New Jersey with Soft Hands. His poems have been featured on Poetry Daily, NPR’s “The Writer’s Almanac,” and New Jersey Network’s “State of the Arts,” as well as in publications such as Poetry, TriQuarterly, and Painted Bride Quarterly. He is the recipient of a Pushcart Prize and two Distinguished Artist Fellowships from the NJ State Council on the Arts. He co-directs the Creative Writing degree program at Warren County Community College. To read more of Ward’s work visit the Poetry Foundation or Painted Bride Quarterly.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Want to study with BJ Ward? At the 2013 Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway, BJ will be leading two exciting, new workshops: the Algonquin-Style Poetry Workshop and one day of the Creative Writing Sampler. He will also be leading a section of Advanced Poetry and available for tutorials. Click here to find out more.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Advance your craft and energize your writing at the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway. Enjoy challenging and supportive sessions, insightful feedback, and an encouraging community. Learn more.

This entry is part of Getaway Reads, a weekly e-mail series curated by Stephanie Cawley that features the writing of the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway faculty.
 
 

Face to Face:

Loss and Homecoming at the 25th Reunion

by Anndee Hochman

 
I didn’t expect to cry after just two hours on the Old Campus. Then again, I had few expectations for my 25th college reunion. For the previous four months, thoughts of returning to New Haven had been eclipsed by a more urgent matter: the rapidly declining health of my 77-year-old father-in-law.

It was prostate cancer. In April, Alvin teetered as he walked down his apartment hallway. By mid-May, he was nearly bedridden. Four days before our reunion, my partner left for Denver to hold vigil by her father’s side. I got on the train to New Haven, cell phone pressed to my hip.

As we shot past Metro Park, I paged through the reunion packet: a crammed agenda of lectures, tours, concerts and plays. For a moment, I felt the same paralysis that had seized me for most of freshman year. I recall leafing through the course catalogue, weighing possible life paths: Could I be an architect? A sociologist? A scholar of Renaissance literature? Back then, the future felt tantalizing and wide, buoyant and scary.

At Union Station, I called my partner for an update: her dad’s breathing was ragged, his body temperature vacillating. A few weeks earlier, Alvin had declared that his idea of freedom was “thinking about a future in which I don’t have to think about the future.” Now he wasn’t talking at all.

Meanwhile, I schlepped my bag up to Lawrance Hall, a rehabbed suite I’d be sharing with my old roomies. Leaded glass windows, chaste twin beds and little gut-punches of nostalgia: Maxine’s make-up scattered around the sink, Pam’s shoes parked in the middle of the floor. Later, a cappella singing swelled Woolsey Hall, where I remembered fanning myself with a graduation program as the university’s president quoted a Talmudic proverb: “You are not required to complete the work, but neither are you permitted to desist from it.”

I wandered the flagstone paths, stopping to talk: the guy who’d sat near me in Bio for Poets; people I swore I’d never seen before. We were hungry to learn what had happened to one another after May 1984. And not just the CV highlights; our talk veered toward the back-stories, the places where our lives had spun off course.

I heard about an engagement cancelled eight weeks before the wedding, about an unplanned third child, a novel written but never published, a fiancé dead at 41, a kindergarten son with a predilection for pink dresses. I told people about the ways my own life had startled me—about leaving the Washington Post, moving far from Philadelphia, about coming out as a lesbian (surprise!), running a marathon (bigger surprise), suffering panic attacks in my 20s, becoming a parent at nearly 40.

There is the public reunion, under the big tent, where we squint (despite those bifocals) at plastic nametags. And there is the other, private, reunion, where your college-aged self collides with your middle-aged self for a moment of reckoning: Can you fold that 20-year-old—yeah, the one binging on chocolate-covered raisins and worrying about her Chaucer paper—in a rueful embrace and laugh about what a short, strange trip it’s been?

Maybe my defenses were softened by months of family crisis, or maybe I was following the lead of my father-in-law, a professor of communication for whom conversation was the surest form of prayer. I found myself vaulting past small talk: “How have you changed? Why did you call off the wedding? What do you want from the next ten years?”

I sensed, at a quarter-century post-graduation, a feeling of contentment, deeper and different from complacency or self-satisfaction. We’d been adults long enough to amass losses and failures, rough patches, plans gone awry: We were in the rich middle of our lives, neither completing nor desisting—just weathering the storms and trying, still, to do some good.

I’d been at the reunion for two hours when my phone buzzed. “He died,” Elissa said, her voice thick with tears. “It was quiet….Oh, sweetie, he’s gone.”

In three days I would shovel Denver dirt into my father-in-law’s grave. I would listen to my brother-in-law play an aching clarinet solo at the service. I would enter a new chapter of my adult life—the one in which we end up, all of us, orphans. But before that, I would sit at a large, round table, eyes stinging, dinner napkin held aloft, and join the class of ’84 in singing about “the shortest, gladdest years of life.”

Here’s the thing: They’re not. The years just keep getting shorter, and the gladdest moment is this one. As we sang “Bright College Years,” as we flapped our napkins in that goofy ritual, I could hear my father-in-law urging me on: Ask real questions. Listen for real answers. Connect, connect, before the light goes out.
 
 
© Anndee Hochman. Originally published in The Philadelphia Inquirer, March 16, 2011.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Anndee Hochman writes feature articles, profiles, and essays about education, health, and the wide, quirky spectrum of family and community life, including issues of adoption, foster care, reproductive technology, same-sex couples, and intentional community. In addition to her regular pieces in the Philadelphia Inquirer, her work has appeared in O, the Oprah MagazineHealthWorking MotherMarie Claire, and online in Literary Mama. She is the author of Anatomies: A Novella and Stories (Picador 2000) and Everyday Acts & Small Subversions: Women Reinventing Family, Community and Home (The Eighth Mountain Press, 1994). For the past eighteen years, Anndee has taught writing to children, teens, and adults in a variety of settings, including schools, senior centers, and a small fishing village on Mexico’s Pacific coast. Her website is www.anndeehochman.com.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Want to study with Anndee Hochman? At the 2013 Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway, Anndee will be teaching the Turning Memory into Memoir workshop. Click here to find out more. 

+ + + + + + + + + +

Advance your craft and energize your writing at the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway. Enjoy challenging and supportive sessions, insightful feedback, and an encouraging community. Learn more.

This entry is part of Getaway Reads, a weekly e-mail series curated by Stephanie Cawley that features the writing of the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway faculty.
 
 

The Imagined

by Stephen Dunn

If the imagined woman makes the real woman
seem bare-boned, hardly existent, lacking in
gracefulness and intellect and pulchritude,
and if you come to realize the imagined woman
can only satisfy your imagination, whereas
the real woman with all her limitations
can often make you feel good, how, in spite
of knowing this, does the imagined woman
keep getting into your bedroom, and joining you
at dinner, why is it that you always bring her along
on vacations when the real woman is shopping,
or figuring the best way to the museum?

                                And if the real woman

has an imagined man, as she must, someone
probably with her at this very moment, in fact
doing and saying everything she’s ever wanted,
would you want to know that he slips in
to her life every day from a secret doorway
she’s made for him, that he’s present even when
you’re eating your omelette at breakfast,
or do you prefer how she goes about the house
as she does, as if there were just the two of you?
Isn’t her silence, finally, loving? And yours
not entirely self-serving? Hasn’t the time come,
once again, not to talk about it?
 

Cleaning Up

by Stephen Dunn

Learning to be gracious, sorrow-freed,
ten years beyond the old rut
of needless suffering, I wanted to kiss the hands
of Nadezhda Mandelstam and Nelson Mandela,
and be done with those greats
as well as the difficulties they triumphed over.
I didn’t want to be brave, or safe.
I resolved never to fake joy,
or pursue old grief. If I encountered opacity,
I’d try to smash it with clarity.
But someone always seemed to be giving me
something wonderful, and I wasn’t going to
complain that I didn’t know why.
I wanted no nostalgia for a landscape
that couldn’t be retrieved,
but did want to be a revealer of secrets
that would unlock the faraway, the unknown.
I wouldn’t want to have the boredom
of immortality, or the hijinks of living
a life of regular chutzpah and dazzle.
The question existed, Why would it matter
what I want or not want?
And the answer is: It would matter to me.
I am he who fiddles on the stoops
of a house in his city, and watches girls
dance around manholes in the street.
I am the one who keeps playing
while the weather encroaches.
Don’t expect from me fidelity
to any one thing. Every day, if I could,
I’d oppose history by altering one detail.
 

© Stephen Dunn. “The Imagined” was originally published in The New Yorker, March 14, 2011.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Stephen Dunn’s seventeenth volume of poetry, Falling Backwards into the World, was released by Jane Street Press at the 2012 Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway. His previous books include Different Hours, which was awarded the 2001 Pulitzer Prize for Poetry, and Here and Now(2011), both from W.W. Norton. Stephen has received awards and fellowships from American Academy of Arts and Letters, The Guggenheim Foundation, the National Endowment for the Arts, Poetry Magazine, NJ State Council on the Arts, Poetry NorthwestMid-American Review, and many others. He is Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Creative Writing at Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, but spends most of his time in Frostburg, Maryland, with his wife, the writer Barbara Hurd. You can read and listen to some of his poems here.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Want to study with Stephen Dunn? At the 2013 Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway, Stephen will lead three special sessions of Advanced Poetry Writing. Click here to find out more.

+ + + + + + + + + +

Advance your craft and energize your writing at the Winter Poetry & Prose Getaway. Enjoy challenging and supportive sessions, insightful feedback, and an encouraging community. Learn more.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers